翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Bi-curious
・ Bi-directional delay line
・ Bi-directional text
・ Bi-elliptic transfer
・ Bi-fuel vehicle
・ Bi-hemispherical reflectance
・ Bi-isotropic material
・ Bi-la kaifa
・ Bi-Level
・ BI-LO
・ BI-LO (Australia)
・ BI-LO (United States)
・ BI-LO 200
・ Bi-Mart
・ Bi-metallic coin
Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization
・ Bi-National Lesbian Conference
・ Bi-partisan appointment republican model
・ Bi-pin connector
・ Bi-Polar (Vanilla Ice album)
・ Bi-Polar Blues
・ Bi-polar Poems
・ Bi-quinary coded decimal
・ BI-RADS
・ Bi-Rite Market
・ Bi-scalar tensor vector gravity
・ Bi-specific T-cell engager
・ Bi-State Conference
・ Bi-State League
・ Bi-State League (1915)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization : ウィキペディア英語版
Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization

''Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization'', 239 U.S. 441 (1915), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that due process protections attach only to administrative activities in which a small number of people are concerned, who are exceptionally affected by the act, in each case upon individual grounds. By contrast, rule-making or quasi-legislative activities that affect a large number of people without regard to the facts of individual cases do not implicate due process protections. It is an important case in American administrative law.
==Facts and procedural posture==
The State Board of Equalization of the state of Colorado and the Colorado Tax Commission ordered that the valuation of all taxable property in Denver be increased by forty percent.〔239 U.S. at 443.〕 Plaintiff company brought suit alleging that it had been deprived of its due process protections because a tax had been levied against its property without it being afforded an opportunity to be heard, in violation of the 14th Amendment.〔239 U.S. at 444.〕 The Colorado Supreme Court ordered that the suit be dismissed.〔Id.〕
The Supreme Court of the United States affirmed the dismissal, holding that no due process rights are implicated when a tax is levied against a large number of people who are all affected equally.〔Id. at 446.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.